Our heartless and unethical old acquaintance, the ‘acceptable risk’

18 Sep

sellafield (2)Demolition has begun this month on the Sellafield chimney, damaged by fire in 1957, releasing contamination into the atmosphere.

Site managers say the radioactivity has now decayed to ‘safe enough levels to work in’.

The BBC reports that the latest research findings are that children living near nuclear power plants do not have an increased risk of developing leukaemia.

 No.

Even a glance at the abstract shows that its finding is: “Our results show little (ie some) evidence of an increase in risk

How many research scientists and MPs live near nuclear power plants?

The study was published in the British Journal of Cancer which is owned by Cancer Research UK and published by the Nature Publishing Group which also publishes the Scientific American. Both journals have given consolation to the nuclear and biotech industries of late. Our next post will refer to the latter.

*

ABSTRACT

Leukaemia in young children in the vicinity of British nuclear power plants: a case–control study: J F Bithell, M F G Murphy, C A Stiller, E Toumpakari, T Vincent and R Wakeford

Concern about the risk of leukaemia in children living near nuclear power plants (NPPs) persists. Previous British analyses have been area based and consequently thought to be less effective than case–control studies.

Cases of childhood leukaemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (LNHL) born and diagnosed in Great Britain between 1962 and 2007, with matched cancer-free controls, were analysed by logistic regression to estimate the risk of residential proximity at birth and diagnosis to the nearest NPP, adjusting for relevant variables.

For 9821 children with LNHL under the age of 5 years, the estimated extra risk associated with residential proximity to an NPP at birth was negative—interpolated Odds Ratio (OR) at 5 km was 0.86 (0.49–1.52). The comparison of 10 618 children with LNHL under five with 16 760 similarly aged children with other cancers also gave a negative estimate of the extra risk of residential proximity at diagnosis—interpolated OR at 5 km was 0.86 (0.62–1.18).

Conclusion:

Our results show little evidence of an increase in risk of LNHL to children aged under 5 years from living in the vicinity of an NPP. Risk estimates are incompatible with comparable ones published in a recent German case–control study.

To read this article in full you may need to log in, make a payment or gain access through a site license.

http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/bjc2013560a.html

.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s